About the Author(s)

Naveen K. Challa Email symbol
Department of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia


Challa NK. Prevalence of amblyopia among the children of Saudi Arabia: A systematic review, 1990–2020. Afr Vision Eye Health. 2022;81(1), a752. https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v81i1.752

Review Article

Prevalence of amblyopia among the children of Saudi Arabia: A systematic review, 1990–2020

Naveen K. Challa

Received: 02 Mar. 2022; Accepted: 28 July 2022; Published: 26 Sept. 2022

Copyright: © 2022. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Background: Amblyopia is the leading cause of visual impairment in children and as such poses a public health problem. Prevalence studies are required to determine the magnitude of visual impairment because of amblyopia. Although there are studies that reported the prevalence of amblyopia in some regions, there are no studies of pooled prevalence of amblyopia in Saudi Arabia. Structured and province-specific studies for Saudi Arabia are thus needed to understand the prevalence and risk factors for amblyopia.

Aim: To use a literature review to estimate the pooled prevalence of amblyopia among children of Saudi Arabia.

Methods: Peer-reviewed articles with data from Saudi Arabian children were extracted between the years 1990 and 2020. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVIS, Embase and Google Scholar were used to extract the relevant articles. The paper quality was assessed using a critical assessment tool designed for systematic reviews and from 22 retrieved citations, seven studies were included in this systematic review.

Results: Out of 15 281 pooled children from seven papers, the estimated prevalence of amblyopia was 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1% – 2.6%). Significant heterogeneity (p < 0.001) was found among these studies.

Conclusion: The pooled prevalence of amblyopia among children of Saudi Arabia is approximately 2.3%. This systemic review also demonstrates that there are limited studies that evaluated the prevalence of amblyopia among children of Saudi Arabia and mostly they had a gender bias.

Contribution: This article presents the prevalence of amblyopia among the children of Saudi Arabia and also the variances in the prevalence of amblyopia among the various regions of Saudi Arabia.

Keywords: amblyopia; prevalence of amblyopia; refractive error; anisometropia; strabismus.


Amblyopia is usually defined as a vision disorder with reduced best-corrected visual acuity in one or both eyes without any attributable ocular pathology in the visual system.1 Amblyopia is one of the principal causes of visual impairment (VI) in children globally.2,3,4 Clear and sharply focused retinal images in both eyes are crucial for normal visual development. If there is a long-term deviation from this situation because of untreated amblyogenic risk factors that cause defocused images during childhood, this usually leads to amblyopia.5,6 Both ocular and non-ocular risk factors can cause amblyopia.

Major ocular risk factors for amblyopia include ocular misalignment (strabismus), stimulus deprivation (cataract, corneal opacities, ptosis and hemangiomas) and uncompensated refractive errors (anisometropia and, for example, aniso-astigmatism). Major non-ocular risk factors for amblyopia include low birth weight, smoking during pregnancy, working in toxic environments, low APGAR score, prematurity and neonatal hospitalisation.7 So, it is important to detect and manage these risk factors in children at an early age to prevent vision loss and thereby improve the quality of life.8,9

To ensure appropriate ocular and visual development and to prevent a steady decline in visual acuity, amblyopia identification is crucial at an early age. With proper estimates of the prevalence of amblyopia, adequate healthcare strategies can be planned, prioritised and executed to reduce the burden of VI because of amblyopia.9,10 It has been shown that the reported prevalence of amblyopia varies with region and age, and, for example, a large systematic review and meta-analysis on the global prevalence of amblyopia indicates that by 2019 there were about 99.2 million people with amblyopia worldwide with a reported prevalence rate of 1.4%, and the prevalence rates were higher in Europe and North America compared with Asia and Africa.10 The change in prevalence across regions poses a challenge in local burden estimates because it is uncertain whether changes in prevalence estimates are true or driven by demographic, methodological or other factors.

It is reported that the prevalence of amblyopia is approximately 1.2% in Singapore, 1.9% in Australia, 4.7% in Canada and 3% in Pakistan. Although a few studies have estimated the prevalence of amblyopia in school children in specific regions of Saudi Arabia,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 there is no single study that estimated the pooled prevalence of amblyopia in Saudi Arabia. Thus this study performed a systematic review of relevant literature to (1) estimate the pooled prevalence of amblyopia among children in Saudi Arabia and (2) assess the differences in prevalence among specific geographic regions of Saudi Arabia.

Objective of the review

The main objective of the study is to estimate the pooled prevalence of amblyopia among children of Saudi Arabia.

Materials and methods

Inclusion criteria

The current study only included articles about children who had amblyopia (Strabismus or refractive disorders were the most common causative factors for the amblyopia).


This study included articles that assessed the prevalence of amblyopia in Saudi Arabia through a pre-school screening programme or via referral to medical centres and clinics.


Studies on children who had a comprehensive eye examination.

Search strategy

In this systematic review, the search keywords were performed with the Boolean operators (or/and) as shown in Figure 1. Main keywords such as (Prevalence or incidence or rate or Frequency or proportion or epidemiology or distribution) or (Major risk or influencing factors) or (cause or reasons) or (effect or impact) and (amblyopia or refractive error or visual impairment or Anisometropia) and (Saudi Arabia) and (children) were searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVIS and Embase. Only studies published between January 1990 and December 2020 were considered. In addition, ProQuest (dissertations and theses) and Google Scholar were used in the search for grey literature. This review was restricted to articles published in the English language only in peer-reviewed journals. Only epidemiological studies with the stated prevalence of amblyopia in children of Saudi Arabia between 1 and 18 years of age were included.

FIGURE 1: Example of Boolean operators used in the search strategy for the current review.

Exclusion criteria

Articles were excluded if (1) they were not conducted in Saudi Arabia and (2) studies that did not assess the prevalence of amblyopia. The study also excluded conference papers, meeting abstracts, editorial discussions and studies without basic data.

Study selection

Following the search, all citations were imported into Endnote X7 software, and duplicates were removed. Two independent colleagues reviewed the titles and abstracts to determine whether papers satisfied the review’s inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers obtained the full texts of potentially eligible studies and thoroughly assessed them against the inclusion criteria. Full-text studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. Any disagreements between the reviewers were discussed and resolved or as necessary a third reviewer commented.

Extraction of data

The extracted data included author information, publication year, population (age), study setting and country and prevalence of amblyopia. Any disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion or with the assistance of a third reviewer. The authors of the articles were contacted to obtain any missing data as well as any additional data that were required.

Data synthesis

The pooled estimate of amblyopia in Saudi Arabian children was calculated using MedCalc Statistical Software version 16.4.3 (MedCalc). MedCalc uses the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation with a random-effects model. Forest plots were used to show the prevalence proportions among the studies. Heterogeneity of reported prevalence among studies was analysed using a chi-square-based Q test.

Ethical considerations

This article followed all ethical standards for research without direct contact with human or animal subjects.


This systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis criteria from 2009. A total of 22 articles were found for the prevalence of amblyopia in Saudi Arabian children but only seven studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis below. The review of the article selection and inclusion process is depicted in the flow chart as presented in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis flow diagram showing the summary of study selection and the inclusion process.

Methodological quality

The 10-item checklist devised by Munn et al. for prevalence studies was used to assess the methodological quality of the qualifying studies.21 Study design, study population, location, number of subjects with amblyopia and number of children with different forms of amblyopia were all retrieved from each study.

All seven studies were cross-sectional, school-based investigations. However, there were considerable disparities in sample size, age group and methods for ocular refraction. Table 1 summarises the qualitative assessment of the seven studies according to Munn’s criteria.21 Among the included studies that reported the prevalence of amblyopia in children, there was significant heterogeneity especially in terms of gender, sample size, prevalence and subgroup analysis (Cochran’s Q-test, p < 0.001; I2 = 95.1%).

TABLE 1: Quality evaluation of included studies according to Munn’s criteria.

Comprehensive eye examinations in all seven studies were carried out by optometrists or ophthalmologists. The characteristics of these studies are presented in Table 2. The prevalence for each study is indicated with a forest plot (see Figure 3).

FIGURE 3: Forest plot showing the prevalence of amblyopia from various studies conducted in Saudi Arabia. Extended lines indicate 95% confidence intervals as found in the seven studies. The corresponding weight and proportionate prevalence of each study are summarised in the table on the right side of the figure.

TABLE 2: Important characteristics of the seven studies included in this review.

Out of the total of 15 281 children from the seven studies, the estimated pooled prevalence of amblyopia was 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0% – 2.6%). Of the seven studies, only one study11 provided the prevalence rates for both boys (2.0%) and girls (1.9%). Five studies11,16,17,19,20 provided information about type of amblyopia. Among these studies, refractive amblyopia was most common (65.1%), followed by strabismus amblyopia (29.4%) and then other causes (5.5%). Two studies11,16 provided prevalence for unilateral amblyopia and bilateral amblyopia at 3.1% and 3.6%, respectively.


The current study involves a systematic review of prevalence of amblyopia in Saudi Arabian children, aged 1–18 years. This is the first systemic review on prevalence of amblyopia among children of Saudi Arabia. The pooled prevalence (2.3%) suggests about 23 children in 1000 are affected with amblyopia in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of amblyopia in Saudi Arabia is higher than the global prevalence reported by Fu et al.,10 and it is also noted that the prevalence of amblyopia in Saudi children is higher than for countries like Singapore (1.2%) and Australia (1.9%) but lower than for Canada (4.7%) and Pakistan (3%). The prevalence of amblyopia in Saudi Arabia varies according to region and ranges from 0.45% to 4.3%. It is also important to note that there were no studies that reported the prevalence of amblyopia in densely populated provinces like Makkah and Al-Madina where there are also differences in socio-economic and demographic differences. Additionally, qualitative analysis of the studies shows that only one study11 fulfilled Munn’s criteria for good-quality studies and included both male and female children. The remaining six studies included here had various limitations such as (1) the type of amblyopia was not mentioned and/or not analysed, (2) females were not included and (3) sample size was not formally calculated.

Other possible limitations of this review include (1) timelines of the published articles were from 1990 to 2020, which might not represent the precise prevalence at the current point in time, (2) age groups are from 1 to 18 years, which is a wide age range and (3) there was insufficient information as to identification of possible non-ocular causes of amblyopia. Hence the prevalence of amblyopia in Saudi Arabian children reported in this study cannot be generalised, and it should be interpreted with caution as there was a gender bias (mostly male children), a sample size bias and other limitations as mentioned above. Well-structured, province-specific, population-based studies without gender bias and with optimally calculated sample sizes are needed to better understand the prevalence and risk factors for amblyopia in Saudi Arabian children (and, to some extent, elsewhere).

Anisometropia affects 3.7% – 7.0% of children in Saudi Arabia and is a primary risk factor for unilateral amblyopia.17,22 Uncompensated refractive error is another important risk factor for amblyopia and Alghamdi in his systemic review on refractive error in Saudi Arabia reported that the overall prevalence of uncorrected refractive error is 16.9%, which is significantly large.23 Apart from this, Qanat et al. reported that the estimated prevalence of strabismus with paediatric ocular illness subjects was 11.8% in Saudi Arabia.24 From these studies,17,22,23,24 it can be observed that the risk factors that cause amblyopia in Saudi Arabia children are very high and possibly could be because of two factors. Firstly, Saudi Arabia’s absence of effective nationwide vision screening programmes for youngsters. While vision screening is part of pre-school requirements, it appears that this function is not fully enforced, as most children begin school without having their eyes examined by optometrists or ophthalmologists.25 Secondly, according to various reports, the public in Saudi Arabia has little awareness or knowledge about refractive errors and other visual or ocular illnesses.26,27 Additionally, according to Aldebasi et al., only 33.4% of elementary school pupils regularly wear their spectacles.11


It is important to do regular ocular and vision screenings for refractive errors in children at the community level, and such screenings should be integrated into school health programmes with public awareness campaigns. Attempts to ensure that the spectacle corrections are used as required and that any cultural barriers to compliance addressed are necessary to prevent any further increase in amblyopia and/or other ocular anomalies.


Over the last three decades, few studies have reported prevalence of amblyopia among Saudi Children. From seven studies that were identified, the pooled prevalence for amblyopia among the children (< 18 years) of Saudi Arabia is approximately 2.3%. Further studies are needed in the appropriate directions to facilitate improved understanding of the prevalence and risk factors for amblyopia.


I would like to thank Dr Saif Alrasheed, Qassim University for his help in the literature search validation and also the proof correction of the article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Author’s contributions

Manuscript is conceptualised, analysed and written by N.K.C.

Funding information

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.


The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated agency of the authors.


  1. Ohlsson J, Villarreal G, Sjöström A, Abrahamsson M, Sjöstrand J. Visual acuity, residual amblyopia and ocular pathology in a screened population of 12–13-year-old children in Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79(6):589–595. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.790609.x
  2. Gunnlaugsdottir E, Arnarsson A, Jonasson F. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness in Icelanders aged 50 years and older: The Reykjavik eye study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86(7):778–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01191.x
  3. Pai AS-I, Wang JJ, Samarawickrama C, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for visual impairment in preschool children: The Sydney paediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmol. 2011;118(8):1495–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.027
  4. Van Leeuwen R, Eijkemans MJ, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, De Jong PT, Simonsz HJ. Risk of bilateral visual impairment in persons with amblyopia: The Rotterdam study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(11):1450–1451. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2006.113670
  5. Weber AL, Wood J. Amblyopia. Prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment. Clin Exp Optom. 2005;88(6):365–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2005.tb05102.x
  6. Simons K, Preslan M. Natural history of amblyopia untreated owing to lack of compliance. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(5):582–587. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.5.582
  7. Mocanu V, Horhat R. Prevalence and risk factors of amblyopia among refractive errors in an Eastern European population. Medicina (Kaunas). 2018;54(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina54010006
  8. Bhola R, Keech R, Kutschke P. Recurrence of amblyopia after occlusion therapy. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2007;113(11):2097–2100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.04.034
  9. Mostafaie A, Ghojazadeh M, Hosseinifard H, et al. A systematic review of Amblyopia prevalence among the children of the world. Romanian J Ophthalmol. 2020;64(4):342–355. https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2020.56
  10. Fu Z, Hong H, Su Z, Lou B, Pan CW, Liu H. Global prevalence of amblyopia and disease burden projections through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(8):1164–1170. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314759
  11. Aldebasi YH. Prevalence of amblyopia in primary school children in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015;22(1):86–91. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.148355
  12. Al-Assaf A, Fatani R. Vision screening of preschool children in Riyadh. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 1994;8(1):9–14.
  13. Abolfotouh M, Aheem Y. Ocular disorders among school boys in a high altitude area of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 1994;8(3):20–24.
  14. Mubarak AF. Prevalence of ocular disorders among school boys in five villages in Al–Baha Region. Ann Saudi Med. 1992;12(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.1992.3
  15. Kahn MU, Hossain MA, Abu-Zeid H, Eid O. Prevalence of eye problems and visual defects in school children of Abha. Saudi Bull Ophthalmol. 1989;4:181–184.
  16. Abolfotouh MA, Badawi I, Faheem Y. Prevalence of amblyopia among schoolboys in Abha city, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. J Egyptian Public Health Assoc. 1994;69(1–2):19–30.
  17. Al Wadaani FA, Amin TT, Ali A, Khan AR. Prevalence and pattern of refractive errors among primary school children in Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia. Glob J Health Sci. 2013;5(1):125–134. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v5n1p125
  18. Al-Rowaily MA. Prevalence of refractive errors among pre-school children at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2010;24(2):45–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2010.01.001
  19. Bardisi WM, Bin Sadiq BM. Vision screening of preschool children in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2002;23(4):445–449.
  20. Al-Tamimi ER, Shakeel A, Yassin SA, Ali SI, Khan UA. A clinic-based study of refractive errors, strabismus, and amblyopia in pediatric age-group. J Fam Community Med. 2015;22(3):158–162. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8229.163031
  21. Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, Lisy K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(3):123–128. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2014.71
  22. Alrahili NHR, Jadidy ES, Alahmadi BSH, et al. Prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors among children aged 3–10 years in western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2017;38(8):804–810. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.8.20412
  23. Alghamdi W. Prevalence of refractive errors among children in Saudi Arabia: Systemic review. Open Ophthalmol J. 2021;15:89–95. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364102115010089
  24. Qanat AS, Alsuheili A, Alzahrani AM, Faydhi AA, Albadri A, Alhibshi N. Assessment of different types of strabismus among pediatric patients in a tertiary hospital in Jeddah. Cureus. 2020;12(12):e11978. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11978
  25. Aldebasi YH, Ahmed MI, Monaco WA. Are optometrists necessary in primary health care centres in Saudi Arabia? Afr Vision Eye Health. 2018;77(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v77i1.402
  26. Aldebasi Y. Young public’s awareness to refractive error deficiency. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2011;5(1):9–15.
  27. Al-Lahim WA, Al-Ghofaili RS, Mirghani H, AlBalawi H. Evaluation of awareness and attitudes towards common eye diseases among the general population of Northwestern Saudi Arabia. Egyptian J Hosp Med. 2018;70(11):1983–1989. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2018.9403


Crossref Citations

1. Parents' Awareness, Knowledge, and Perception of Amblyopia in Children: A Study in Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia
Ismail I Abuallut, Khalid M Alameer, Bandar M Abuageelah, Eman Hurissi, Masoud M Alqahtani, Ibrahim M Gosadi, Faisal M Tubaigy, Yousef M Alyami
Cureus  year: 2023  
doi: 10.7759/cureus.48956