Original Research

The prevalence of refractive error in three communities of Cape Town, South Africa

M. Otutu, J. Nachega, J. Harvey, D. Meyer
African Vision and Eye Health | South African Optometrist: Vol 71, No 1 | a65 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v71i1.65 | © 2012 M. Otutu, J. Nachega, J. Harvey, D. Meyer | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 09 December 2012 | Published: 09 December 2012

About the author(s)

M. Otutu, Community Health Division, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University
J. Nachega, Centre for Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa
J. Harvey, Centre for Statistical Support, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa
D. Meyer, Division of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (808KB)

Abstract

The prevalence, distribution and demographic associations of refractive error in three communities in Cape Town, South Africa were assessed. In this cross-sectional study, a clustered random sampling procedure was used to recruit participants (n=176; age=40.6±14.7 years; males=76, females=96) from Khayelitsha, Milnerton, and Mitchell’s Plain. From March to May 2010, participants underwent autore-fraction and subjective refraction eye examinations.A structured interview was used to collect data on sociodemographics, age, gender, level of education, employment and race. Participants younger than 15 years, non-residents, or residents for less than six months, who declined signing the informed consent forms were excluded from the study. In this study myopia was defined as the spherical equivalent value in the better eye of −1.00D or worse and hyperopia as the spherical equivalent value in the better eye of ≥1.00D. Astigmatism was defined as −0.50 cylinder or worse in the better eye. The prevalence of myopia was 17.4% with a 90% confidence interval (CI) of 12.65-22.15, hyperopia was 13.4% (90% CI 9.13-17.67), and astigmatism was 60% (90% CI 53.86-66.14). Myopia was found to be significantly associated with race and age; while hyperopia was significantly associated with age, employment and race. The results of this study may assist in planning for eye care on district level. (S Afr Optom 2012 71(1) 32-38)


Keywords

Astigmatism; cross sectional study: refraction; prevalence of refractive error

Metrics

Total abstract views: 6446
Total article views: 5667

 

Crossref Citations

1. Trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice: Survey of eye care practitioners in Africa
Augustine N. Nti, Bismark Owusu-Afriyie, Uchechukwu Levi Osuagwu, Samuel Kyei, Godwin Ovenseri-Ogbomo, Kelechi C. Ogbuehi, Mhamed Ouzzani, Kingsley E. Agho, Khathutshelo Percy Mashige, Edgar Ekure, Bernadine N. Ekpenyong, Stephen Ocansey, Antor O. Ndep, Chukwuemeka Junior Obinwanne, David A. Berntsen, James S. Wolffsohn, Kovin S. Naidoo
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye  vol: 46  issue: 1  first page: 101597  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101597

2. Eye health promotion-oriented policy statements in various national and provincial health policy documents in South Africa
Hlupheka L. Sithole
African Vision and Eye Health  vol: 80  issue: 1  year: 2021  
doi: 10.4102/aveh.v80i1.597

3. Prevalence of Refractive Errors in Rural Population of Ganjam, Southern Odisha
Sachala Bhoi, Kasturi Mohapatra, Nageswar Rao Subudhi B. , Pallavi Ray
Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare  vol: 6  issue: 42  first page: 2773  year: 2019  
doi: 10.18410/jebmh/2019/576

4. Patterns of refractive errors and visual function in school-going children in South Africa
Rinkie M. Lekganyane, Nobukhosi Siziba, Musa T. Mabasa, Lebogang Matlala, Khutjo E. Machipi, Rangoaga G. Maditsi, Thuso Khohomela, Masego G. Ramonyai, Christina M.L. Segwati, Pheagane M.W. Nkoana
African Vision and Eye Health  vol: 83  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/aveh.v83i1.845