Keratoconus belongs to a group of conditions that cause progressive corneal thinning and distortion.¹ The most common primary type of corneal ectasia is keratoconus, followed by other differential conditions such as pellucid marginal degeneration and Terrien’s degeneration.²

Keratoconus is an ocular condition characterized by the progressive non-inflammatory thinning and protrusion of the cornea,² accompanied by the decentration of the resulting cone, corneal distortion, increased irregular astigmatism and myopia. The aetiology and pathogenesis of keratoconus remains inconclusive,^3,4 with multiple possible causative factors including genetic disorders, hormonal changes, atopic conditions⁵ and, most commonly, biomechanical factors such as eye rubbing.^4,6

Histopathological features consist of thinning of the corneal stroma, iron deposition in the epithelial basement membrane, breaks in the Bowman’s layer, compaction of stromal collagen fibres and folds in Descemet’s membrane.⁷ It has been hypothesized that biomechanical factors lead to other histopathological features, such as keratocyte apoptosis, which ultimately causes changes in the cornea and results in a decrease in the total number of keratocytes, the release of degradative enzymes, and the loss of corneal stroma over a period of time.⁸

There are published population-based studies indicating the prevalence of keratoconus in Africa, whilst globally this figure varies widely, depending on the geographic location, diagnostic criteria used and the cohort of patients selected.^2,9 A review article¹⁰ in 2012 revealed only two population-based studies by Hofstetter¹¹ in the USA and by Jonas¹² in India. According to this review, Hofstetter reported¹¹ a prevalence of 600 per 100 000, and Jonas reported 2300 per 100 000. However, it is worth highlighting that genetic and environmental factors influence the differences in frequencies of keratoconus in various populations.²

Keratoconus may be classified according to the central corneal steepening as well as the cone morphological and topographical patterns using corneal topography maps. Keratoconus has been classified according to its keratometric readings and/or signs, the distorted mires and size of its cone.^1,2 The cone characteristics observed during the various stages of keratoconus can be categorised as either topographical or morphological. Topographical characteristics include cone location, apex decentration and topographical corneal pattern. The location of the cone may be either central (located within the central 3 mm zone) or paracentral (located beyond the central 3 mm zone).⁵ The paracentral location could be further classified as: superior, inferior, nasal, or temporal to the central 3 mm. Studies^13,14,15 revealed that the keratoconic cone can be found in any location on the cornea, with the manner and motion in which force is applied to the cornea during eye rubbing leading to its decentration.^8,16

Various corneal topographical patterns have been reported, namely: round, oval, superior steepening, inferior steepening, irregular, symmetric bow tie, symmetric bow tie with skewed radial axes (SB/SRAX), asymmetric bow tie with inferior steepening (AB/IS), asymmetric bow tie with superior steepening and asymmetric bow tie with skewed radial axes (AB/SRAX).^8,17 Distinguishing the topographical pattern allows the progression of incipient cases of keratoconus to be detected early and differentiated from common misdiagnosed cases of pellucid marginal degeneration and Terrien’s marginal degeneration.^8,17 Topographical patterns are particularly useful in incipient stages for unilateral cases in the undiagnosed eye.^8,17 Ertan et al.¹⁸ reported on the frequency of the following corneal topographical patterns in three different age groups. The bowtie in the younger than 21 years old, inferior global cone in those 21–40 years old, and inferior temporal global cones in those older than 40 years old.¹⁸ Ameerh et al.¹⁹ reported, independent of staging of keratoconus, global and bowtie cone patterns to be the most common on 210 bilateral keratoconics in a clinic-based population in Jordan.

Morphological characteristics of the keratoconic cone involve the apex and the point of maximal protrusion, and are used to determine the amount of corneal conicity and the degree of keratoconus using corneal apex power.²⁰ The cone type is divided into three categories: nipple, oval and globus cones. A nipple cone is a small, near-central cone of 5 mm or less in diameter, resembling a circular shape in the paracentral region of the cornea, inferior nasally.^8,21 The rest of the cornea around the cone is normal or flat in comparison. Oval cones have corneal displacement of the apex below the midline, resulting in a cone located mid-peripherally, with a diameter greater than 5 mm, usually in the inferior temporal location.^8,21 The superior area of the cornea is normal or flatter in comparison to the cone.⁸ The globus cone has a diameter greater or equal to 75% of the diameter of the cornea.^8,21

The Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) study¹⁵ was used to stage the progression of keratoconus. Alternatively, this serves to grade to severity of the keratoconus. The study used a multi-centre, prospective, observational design to describe the course of keratoconus on 1209 subjects over a 3 year period. The study produced a table (see Table 1) to stage or grade the keratoconus using the steepest keratometric reading.

The use of corneal topography alone cannot lead to a direct diagnosis of keratoconus as it must be corroborated with clinical signs, symptoms and/or corneal thickness scans. These diagnostic tools help to distinguish and diagnose keratoconus from cases of normal irregular astigmatism and corneal dystrophies.^1,2 The diagnosis of keratoconus is based on numerous signs and symptoms presenting at various stages according to the severity of the condition. This information will aid in the sequential treatment, ranging from spectacles, contact lenses to various corneal surgeries.

The objectives of this study were to analyse corneal topography maps in order to determine the stage of keratoconus, locate the cone position, analyse the amount of apical decentration from the centre of the cornea, and to ultimately establish if these different cone characteristics were related to different stages of keratoconus.

Patient contact lens record files at the University of KwaZulu-Natal’s Eye Clinic, South Africa, underwent a retrospective analysis. This analysis was conducted between the years 2010 to 2014 subsequent to ethical clearance from the School of Health Science Research and Ethics Committee (UKZN). Patients with a diagnosis of keratoconus and good quality corneal topography maps on the Oculus 3M corneal topographer were included in the study sample. This resulted in 106 cases being identified from which a sample of 190 eyes were admitted for analysis.

Corneal topography maps of the subject’s most recent visit were analysed in order to classify the stage of keratoconus and to locate the apex and position of the cone. These two characteristics were analysed with respect to the right or left eyes. However, no analysis was obtained correlating the location to eye laterality. The sample comprised of either one or both eyes of the same or different subjects depending on the clinical diagnosis of keratoconus. The maps were also used to determine the morphological and topographical characteristics of the cone. The placido topographer was based on the reflection system, in which a placido disc image was projected on the cornea and a camera captured the reflected image. The corneal topographer used in this study was the Oculus 3M.

The results of this retrospective study of 106 patients (190 eyes) who were clinically diagnosed with keratoconus are presented with respect to the staging of keratoconus and the frequency of cone location, cone apex decentration, cone morphology and cone topographical patterns, respectively.

The average patient age was 25.17±11.42 years, ranging from 10 to 60 years old. Gender and ethnicity were not indicated in all patient files thereby excluding their use in analysis.

Regarding the staging (see Table 1), the sample distribution revealed 10 eyes for Stage 1 (mild), 61 eyes for Stage 2 (moderate) and 119 eyes for Stage 3 (advanced) keratoconus. Frequency analysis was used to report the characteristics of the cone for the various stages of keratoconus.

As shown in Figure 1, 66% of cones were central in Stage 1 (mild keratoconus). In Stage 2 (moderate keratoconus), 50% were central, and in Stage 3 (advanced keratoconus), 65% were central.

As shown in Figure 2, 44% of the cones in Stage 1 (mild keratoconus) were decentered between 0 mm – 1 mm, 52% of the Stage 2 (moderate keratoconus) cones were decentered between 0 mm – 1 mm, and in Stage 3 (advanced keratoconus), 65% of the cones had an apical decentration between 0 mm – 1 mm.

As shown in Figure 3, the most frequent cone morphology in Stage 1 (88%), 2 (88%) and 3 (84%) were nipple-shaped cones.

As shown in Figure 4, for Stage 1 (mild keratoconus), the most frequent patterns were round (36%) and symmetrical bowtie (36%). In Stage 2 (moderate keratoconus), the round pattern was most frequent (32%), and in Stage 3 (advanced keratoconus) the round (22%) and irregular (30%) patterns were most frequent.

The majority of participants (76%) had bilateral keratoconus, suggesting a lower frequency of unilateral keratoconus. Studies in China and the United Kingdom have reported lower incidence of unilateral keratoconus.^30,31,32 The reporting of cone characteristics using frequency analysis appeared in numerous other studies,^13,19,33 and our results revealed that the majority of cones were centrally located for all three stages. Additionally there appears to be an inferior displacement of the cone in approximately a third of cases in the mild and moderate stages of keratoconus. A similar finding with smaller samples and no staging of keratoconus was found in other frequency studies.^33,34 Auffarth et al.³⁵ studied 71 eyes and found a mean cone decentration of 0.91 mm. However, their classification differed to that used in our study, in which cone decentration (not cone apical) within the central 3 mm of the corneal cap was classified as central. Whilst Baum et al.³⁴ found paracentral cones to be most frequent, the methodology may have used different criterion for central referencing.

Identifying a definite morphology for a specific stage of the disease can be a challenge because of the multifactorial etiology of keratoconus. Several diseases, such as rosacea, eczema or allergic conjunctivitis, have different pathophysiological mechanisms that produce the corneal changes seen in keratoconus. This study found that the most prevalent morphology was nipple in all three stages of keratoconus. Corneal rubbing will cause epithelial injury and continuous keratocyte apoptosis, causing a decrease in keratocytes as well as releasing degradative enzymes.⁸ Hence, if the cone begins with a nipple morphology, continuous rubbing will cause degradation of the epithelium, resulting in a larger area of thinning, leading to a change in the corneal morphology.¹⁶ Our finding is similar to other studies, which found that the most prevalent cone locations were central and paracentral, with nipple morphology being associated with these locations.^36,37

Regarding an association between the stage of keratoconus and cone topography, the results showed round and symmetrical bow tie patterns to be more frequent in the mild stage. The round, irregular and inferior steepening patterns were most frequent in the moderate stage, and the most frequent patterns for the severe stage were irregular, round and symmetrical bow tie. Studies^8,16 suggest the impracticality of predicting what pattern would be expected, as each keratoconic cornea has periods of progression as well as periods of remission. However, topographical patterns have been shown to be useful in diagnosing incipient stages (forme fruste) and differentially diagnosing other forms of corneal ectasia.^17,29 An observation from this study is that the round topographical pattern has a definite presence in all stages of keratoconus, hence implying for all stages of keratoconus that the steepest part of a keratoconic cornea is round and off-centre.¹⁷ Clinically this may be useful to the practitioner attempting to fit corneal or scleral contact lenses.

The study attempted to isolate characteristics for the various stages of keratoconus. However, the results indicate that all three stages appear to have a predominance of central cones with cone apical displacement between 0 mm and 2 mm. Nipple cone morphology was most common in all three stages, as was round topographical patterns, with symmetrical bow tie patterns additionally presenting in Stage 1, and irregular patterns in Stage 3. The results from the frequency analysis of the sample may be useful clinically to predict the most appropriate method of keratoconus management.

The use of cone analysis has generally not been considered by practitioners when staging keratoconus. The study highlights cone characteristics associated with the different stages of keratoconus and draws attention to the most frequent cone characteristics of cone location, apical decentration, cone morphological shapes, and cone topographical patterns. The results of this study might be used to guide practitioners on which lens designs may be required more frequently in managing these patients towards obtaining optimal visual acuity. The cone analysis additionally serves as a complement to the more commonly cited clinical signs of nerve visibility, Fleischer’s ring, Vogt’s striae and corneal scarring.^15,33 Although the study indicates cone characteristics that are more frequent in a South African sample, a study with a larger sample size that also accounts for gender and ethnicity is recommended.

Read online: Scan this QR code with your smart phone or mobile device to read online.