Original Research

Current practices of diagnostic techniques requir- ing the use of ophthalmic drugs among KwaZulu- Natal optometrists*

K. P. Mashige, K. S. Naidoo
African Vision and Eye Health | South African Optometrist: Vol 68, No 4 | a174 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v68i4.174 | © 2009 K. P. Mashige, K. S. Naidoo | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 17 December 2009 | Published: 17 December 2009

About the author(s)

K. P. Mashige, BSc (Wits), BOptom (UDW), CAS (NewEnCo), MOptom (UKZN), South Africa
K. S. Naidoo, BSc, BOptom (UDW), MPH (Temple), OD (PCO)

Full Text:



In an

endeavour to improve the quality of optometric eye care services in South Africa, the scope of practice was expanded to include the use of ocular diagnostic procedures such as goniosco-
py that require the use of ophthalmic drugs. The purpose of this study was to assess the practices of specific diagnostic techniques (contact tonometry, 78 D/90 D lens fundus examination, binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and gonioscopy) requiring the use of ophthalmic drugs among optometrists in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) province. These specific techniques are referred to as diagnostic procedures in this article. A questionnaire containing information on demography and practice of these specific techniques was sent to all 213 KwaZulu-Natal registered optometrists who owned private practices. One hundred and thirty two completed questionnaires were received, a response rate of 62%. One hundred and seventeen (55%) of the questionnaires were included in the analysis of which 55% of the respondents were females and 45% were males. Sixty two optometrists (53%) were certified in di-

agnostic procedures but many procedures were not being practiced. These procedures and the percentage respondents were: Contact tonometry (60%), 78 D/90 D lens fundus examination (60%), binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (84%) and gonioscopy (78%). Also, among these certified respondents (62 optometrists), a significant proportion (60%) disagreed when asked if they were confident and proficient in performing the relevant diagnostic procedures. Many, (61%) agreed that lack of incentives discouraged them from routinely performing the procedures. More than half (58%), agreed that chair time was an important factor in deciding whether or not to perform these diagnostic procedures. Of
the total respondents (117), 86% agreed that they were confident about the accuracy of their referrals and less than half (45%) disagreed that diagnostic procedures should be the sole responsibility of ophthalmologists. Less than half (48%) agreed
that diagnostic procedures should be incorporated into routine eye examinations. This study indicatesthat the performance of these diagnostic procedures was limited despite many optometrists having the  necessary educational certification. It is recom-
mended that initiatives that can be translated into practical action such as CPD workshops should pay greater attention to the improvement of diagnosticskills and practice. In addition, further education or opportunities emphasizing the importance of per-
forming these diagnostic procedures over financialgains and time constraints are warranted.


Scope of practice of optometry; specific diagnostic procedures; ophthalmic diagnostic drugs and optometry


Total abstract views: 3409
Total article views: 2519


Crossref Citations

1. The effect of 1% tropicamide on central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure
Dimakatso G. Mashala, Bevily Nukeri, Alpheus S. Phaka, Angel N. Mashabu, Mlungisi J. Fakude, Phillip M. Seabi, Matome Mmakgaha, Ramadimetja P. Sedibeng
African Vision and Eye Health  vol: 83  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/aveh.v83i1.862